Saturday, March 20, 2010
holding time in being held
Persons make their own way by way of actualizing potential based within herself/himself, inasmuch as s/he’s true to his/her own venturing.
Unsightly slashes for a language lacking gender-neutral indicators.
Why not coin some neologisms: ‘hiers’ for “her/his”; ‘hiermself’ for “her/himself”? Is etymogeny malleable or what?
If individuation seeks gender balance—which was the Jungian-archetypal idea of Anima/Animus Shadowing on the way to one’s ownmost humanity in “the second half of life”—how are we to denote that female and male may each embody a balance of feminine and masculine?
At least, one may need the question for intimacies feeling all those so-gendered complementarities of Literature and psychology as ours, recountable in some singular way, as if in one name.
December 10, 2019
OK, so ‘they’ gets to be Merriam-Webster’s “Word of the Year” as non-gendered option. One can get used to that.
“Persons make their own way by way of actualizing potential based within themself, inasmuch as they are true to their own venturing.”
But my point above had been about gynandry (or androgyny): acknowledging gender balance in oneself, not washing away gender.
I wouldn’t say of you that I love them.
Of course, it’s very odd to highlight your gynandry by saying of you that I love hierm.
-- gary e. davis --- 11:21 AM