Monday, May 30, 2011

playhouse notes

I’ve spent most free time of the past couple of weeks doing meta-writing or textual programming. A novelist mapping out the story is programming.

A resultant set of textual points or themes can orient a future free play along the path (I’ve intimated so often, one way or another). So, creativity can be as much about travel planning as narrating the trip.

I love metaplay.

Friday, May 13, 2011

a Habermasian sense of cultural evolution

I do want to get away from Habermasian issues, but I’m so good at it, I easily fall into trying to appropriate his thinking into my own Project. 

Tuesday, May 03, 2011


I looked forward to receiving today’s book order via shipping to my department, but the pleasure of seeing Harold Bloom’s final book was special, even moving, because the book, he says, is his last (of tens). Old Harold has a renown in late 20th C academic literary studies comparable to Samuel Johnson in his era. He’s obsessed with Literature (he says at the beginning of his new book). For years, photos on book jackets show his white hair as disheveled as someone just out of bed, like Einstein or Mark Twain.

His name is engraved on the book jacket cover in larger font than the title of the book, The Anatomy of Influence: Literature as a Way of Life. His “Praeludium” begins
When I began writing this book,….My model was to be Robert Burton’s Anatomy of Melancholy (1621)….Traces of Burton’s marvelous madness abide in this book….Burton’s melancholy emanated from his fantastic learning: he wrote to cure his own learnedness….
Bloom’s first chapter is titled “Literary Love.” “When I was very young, freedom beckoned through the poets I first loved: Hart Crane, William Blake, Percy Bysshe Shelly, Wallace Stevens, Walt Whitman, William Butler Yeats, John Milton, and above all William Shakespeare….” | May 20 update: Bloom’s book is extensively featured in this week’s New York Times Book Review.

Also received today is neuroscientist David J. Linden’s new The Compass of Pleasure: how our brains make orgasm, exercise, generosity, learning, [and other things] feel so good. I’m interested in the evolutionary roots of motivation, as it relates to enaction, aspiration, individuation, etc.

I received Enaction: toward a new paradigm for cognitive science (MIT Press, 2011). Believe it or not, my enactional orientation to human development is many years old; so, I’m glad to see the notion formally explored.

I received J. Hillis Miller’s On Literature, which expresses a global approach to Literature, especially relative to his close friend Jacques Derrida.

Lastly, I received Jacques Derrida’s Parages (which means something like ‘equals in dignity’), a gathering of key essays of his that were previously only available in separate locations. I have a complete collection of Derrida-in-translation.

So there he was in a balmy oasis with only the intimacy of those books weaving into each other….

Actually, their potential intimacy is a projective part of a net spanning a couple of seasons with others I thought I’d take into myself months ago, like missed appointments I manage to not be blamed for, yet so many ventures I “can’t wait” to inhabit, but do (not admiring my restraint).

Sunday, May 01, 2011


The weekend was so good: gorgeous weather, a new desk chair (the old one fell apart after 20 years), and the writing I’m offering tonight, done Friday through today and posted as having been done over these 3 days.

transpersonal differencing

The title is strange, but it makes sense in light of what else I’ve written this weekend. And this is easy reading, an expression of practicality in the series of pieces, yet also a preface to upcoming work.

a sense of Self / [inter]personal difference

Though this isn’t difficult to read (relatively speaking), it was one of the more difficult pieces I’ve ever done, because it’s so important to me. Doing this was the general plan of recent days, but earlier, unplanned work this weekend seemed importantly preliminary to this. I suppose the plan was implicitly all of what led to this discussion.