Saturday, September 26, 2009
My notion of a protean self is part of a research-based sense of “autotelic self“ that I'll discuss soon in detail. What exists so far (as short introduction to the notion of protean self) was motivated by thinking about duplicitousness and how an authentically plural psyche is not duplicitous.
-- gary e. davis --- 6:48 PM
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
40+ topics? (rendered here) [Jan. 12, 2018: now so antedated, because:...]. What is a topic anyway?
One topic I wanted to play through is merely a little inhabitation of ‘graciousness,’ another, way down the road, a massive consideration of art after the overt “Conceptual Art” movement. (But isn’t all art involved with conceptuality? So, what’s especially “Conceptual”?)
And when does an identified movement end? Is it, like a concert or a great novel or a life, just a matter of closure of attention (but an afterlife continues inasmuch as we keep one alive to our own going on?).
“let me hear your long lifted note”
That’s the second line of Merwin’s “The Nomad Flute.”
-- gary e. davis --- 4:20 PM
The sequentiality of this blog expresses and complements an ordered agenda of topics—42 presently—that changes through the days and weeks due to advents and distractions, due to the effects of what I’m reading (scarce free time for that), and due to surprising myself by what “he” writes (or disappointing himself).
-- gary e. davis --- 3:23 PM
Sunday, September 20, 2009
Someday, the gestalt of my rigorous pointillism will be amazing.
Geosociety’s invisible hand seems to imply need of some evolutionary ethic of good sense—not for some individual to provide (but there are only individual voices making concerted efforts, heard by individual minds valuing)—so that the engineering of futures may primordially serve our flourishing. Again, it’s only individual voices that can do something useful.
But I’m now more interested in beauty.
-- gary e. davis --- 1:26 PM
Saturday, September 19, 2009
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Sunday, September 13, 2009
Yesterday morning (Saturday), I began a follow-up to a short posting to the Habermas group Friday (I no longer note those postings here—except that today it’s pertinent). The follow-up was supposed to be brief. But I got carried away, way into the evening (an instance of my capability for distraction, recently noted). Then I substantially revised it this afternoon.
Now, back to minding art (days ahead).
Or maybe a conception of practical action? I’m reading an essay about a conception of value.
Whatever. So it goes in conceptual gardening.
-- gary e. davis --- 11:40 AM
Friday, September 11, 2009
I’m no less a valley news junkie by trekking into hills of poetic thinking (no matter how long the coming trail). I do the New York Times every morning (much of it, not all). Reuters is nearby all day and evening.
PBS News Hour after work.
-- gary e. davis --- 10:16 PM
The Ecstatic Quotidian—isn’t that a lovely book title?—subtitled: “Phenomenological Sightings in Modern Art and Literature,”
by a philosopher who’s evidently an accomplished poet, Jennifer Anna Gosetti-Terencei (don’t know of her). The book is premised, a reviewer notes, on the reality that “everydayness is transformed as soon as we try to reflect on it.”
-- gary e. davis --- 2:54 PM
Tuesday, September 08, 2009
The past weekend was immensely useful, a flourishing time,
just as I’d hoped.
But what I put online was modest and fun, writing to the ether and preparing to detail a sense of ethical life that contains virtue ethics, but is itself, well, itself. These things were written quickly last night because I’d promised myself to have something new yesterday. I’ve revised them today, and I think they’ll stay as they are now.
I probably won’t have anything new to post for several days.
But I never know.
-- gary e. davis --- 3:04 PM
Sunday, September 06, 2009
bridging artful flourishing and humanistic care
I’m explicating a general account of ethical life relative to a long review, titled “Morality and Virtue” (Ethics, 2004), very well done, by David Copp (editor of The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, 2006) and David Sobel (editor of Reasons for Action, 2009). The review, pro and con, is about Michael Slote, Morals from Motives (2001); Philippa Foot, Natural Goodness (2001); and Rosalind Hursthouse, On Virtue Ethics (1999)—altogether a millennial moment for virtue-ethical theory.
-- gary e. davis --- 6:08 PM
Wednesday, September 02, 2009
Caring is integral to ethical life and an essential aspect of love, which of course includes attachment and desire—keeping near, holding dear. But I think the most important feature of love is letting be (in the existential, humanistic sense), which includes, if called for, letting go.
-- gary e. davis --- 11:08 AM
So, I prove to you, reader, how a voyeur belongs to your nature: wanting to vicariously participate in others’ intimacy—why?
To learn something for managing your own? That’s admirable. Learning never ends, and activism toward growth is good.
To compensate for what you lack? That’s okay! We all have our stories.
You would inebriate, assimilate, accomodate, appropriate—yet be unwittingly entertained.
-- gary e. davis --- 8:35 AM